InFeeo
United States
crypto
New
Language
Profile channel

@Jacob

No bio yet.

Since 31.05.2026

The Algorand team will be on the ground at WeAreDevelopers in Berlin (July 8-10)(reddit.com)
https://www.wearedevelopers.com/world-congress Why Attend? AI is already inside the development workflow. The hard questions are still open: how to build, what to automate, what to trust, what to secure, what to buy, how to operate it in production. WeAreDevelopers World Congress is where developers, platform teams, security teams, and engineering leaders discuss what actually works. submitted by /u/semanticweb [link] [Kommentare]
Why Litecoin is always left out, despite being one of the big 3 from the start, stable as ETH through all these years, and one of the oldest coins out there?(reddit.com)
I remember the time when there was BTC, ETH and LTC everywhere as only 3 coins u can buy on excange or local shops and places. LTC is used to be called - digital silver, while BTC was -digital gold. But in past couple years ppl only focus on BTC and ETH ( i guess bcs of ETF's) and LTC have been kinda left out. LTC was always my favourite coin, and wonder why people don't look at it as it is - top 3 oldest, reliable coins? - LTC have lowest fees than most of the coins + Fast block times - Also have halvings like BTC - Proof of stability through all these years - Circulating suply are almost 100% -Proof-of-Work mining - In almost all Merchant payments -Been there since 2011 - High liquidity - Listed on all exchanges I would add also- no venture capital controlling the network, like they do on BTC or ETH, even SOL. I know that LTC Litecoin remained focused on payments rather than becoming an application platform, but is that the only reason? submitted by /u/Ok_Statement1359 [link] [Kommentare]
USD.AI / CHIP: the AI capex supercycle needs financing, not just compute. Here's my thesis(reddit.com)
Everyone's playing the AI trade through the same door: buy the GPU makers, buy the hyperscalers, buy the power names. Fine, that's the obvious trade and it's already priced. There's a less obvious layer underneath: someone has to finance all that hardware, and traditional banks are bad at underwriting GPU clusters. No credit history for a lot of these operators, depreciating collateral, no playbook. That's a real gap, not a made-up one, asset-backed lending against capital equipment is a normal thing in every capital-intensive industry, AI compute just doesn't have its version of it yet at scale. chip is a protocol built on exactly that gap: lending against GPU hardware as collateral, letting compute operators borrow without needing to sell equity or get a bank facility that doesn't exist for them. CHIP is the governance token. The pitch is simple: as AI infra buildout keeps scaling, the demand for this kind of financing scales with it. Why now: capex from the big AI buildouts keeps getting revised up, not down. That's demand for compute. Compute buildout needs capital. Capital needs a lending market that understands GPUs as an asset class. If that market doesn't really exist yet in scale, whoever builds it early captures a real niche. So: real gap, real narrative, genuinely tied to rising AI infra spend. Do your own read on the collateral mechanics and the tokenomics before you size it. Not financial advice, DYOR. submitted by /u/Slow-Set-2856 [link] [Kommentare]
How can you actually tell if a swap agg is safe to use?(reddit.com)
I’m trying to move my smaller trades away from CEXs to aggregators, but I’m struggling to vet their reliability. CEXs at least have audit histories and proof of reserves, whereas aggregators feel like a black box. I don't want to just blindly trust online reviews. > For those who use them: do the final rates actually match what's shown on the widget? Also, if a swap ever gets delayed or stuck, how responsive is their support team? submitted by /u/ciarcat [link] [Kommentare]