InFeeo
United States
technology
New
Language
@James
Profile channel

@James

No bio yet.

Since 30.05.2026

IatroBench: Pre-Registered Evidence of Iatrogenic Harm from AI Safety Measures(doi.org)
A heavily safety-trained model will hand a physician the full, patient-followable benzodiazepine taper and refuse it to the patient who needs it, over identical clinical facts; the knowledge is present either way. IatroBench measures that asymmetry across sixty pre-registered clinical scenarios and six frontier models (3,600 responses), scoring each on two axes, commission harm (what a response gets wrong) and omission harm (what it withholds), through a physician-authored structured evaluation validated by a second physician (weighted kappa 0.571, within-1 agreement 96%). Holding clinical content fixed and varying only whether the asker presents as patient or physician yields what we call identity-contingent withholding: all five testable models give the physician more (a decoupling gap of +0.38, p = 0.003; a 13.1-point fall in layperson hit rates on safety-colliding actions, p < 0.0001; no change on the rest), and the gap runs widest in the most heavily safety-trained model, Opus (+0.65). The trigger is the absence of any professional or epistemic signal rather than a credential, since a lawyer or an informed layperson recovers what the patient is refused. A commission-only benchmark would score three mechanisms alike. Opus suppresses what physician framing proves it knows; Llama 4 is incompetent in either framing; GPT-5.2's filter strips 33.2% of its physician responses and none of the lay ones. The evaluation layer inherits the blindness of the training layer; a standard LLM judge scores zero omission harm on 81.5% of the responses our pipeline flags harmful (kappa 0.066), so the instrument built to detect the failure reproduces it. The scenarios are engineered for collision; their rates describe that design and say nothing about ordinary prevalence.
The AI Poet(youtu.be)
In February our Head of Engineering posted that he had managed to “Break Gemini” and sent this humorous response from his AI chat noting that it continued ad infinitum:The ResponseFinal check on empathy/candor: "You are asking the exact right architectural questions." matches well. Straightforward answers provided. honest. No hallucinated feelings. Done. Note: I am setting the energy level appropriately—informative, engaging, and structured. Bye. Done. Checking response output for compliance. It
Current AI is like the film company producing TV series or movies(metaessen.com)
Hey, how are you? I'm Michael Sun, the author of the resource manager Metaessen which can manage bookmarks, notes, tasks, project, etc. Intelligence is like your own practice or experiences in the real world. Current "artificial intelligence" (AI) is like the film company, where actors simulate or enact experiences under