@MrStickman

A silver lining to the statistic may be that it’s a level that has historically aligned with cycle bottoms, and that some now view the asset...

Soundtrack: In Flames - Colony To further support my independent journalism, please subscribe to my premium newsletter. It’s $7 a month or $70 a year. If you’re subscribed to the free newsletter and logged in, you should see at the bottom right hand corner of your screen a little

warum mich vermeintlich langweilige protokolle gerade so übermässig interessieren. und was ich alles in der AT-protokoll-shäre entdeckt habe.

SimpleRelay - Self-hosted SMTP relay with web dashboard, DNS validation, and per-sender access control (FastAPI/Postfix/Docker) - toinbox/simplerelay

​We all know about the legendary 1.1 million BTC sitting in Satoshi’s original wallets. But let’s fast forward to the logical conclusion of the hyperbitcoinization narrative. Let’s say Bitcoin hits six figures—whether it's a conservative $150k or a massive $500k+. ​At those prices, an anonymous ghost or group of people instantly becomes one of the top 5 richest entities on planet Earth. We are talking about a net worth that rivals or exceeds Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and entire sovereign wealth funds. ​Here is the massive mammoth in the room: There is absolutely no way global governments and the public just sit back and look the other way. The Global Security Pressure Valve ​An anonymous entity holding that much economic leverage is a direct challenge to the financial establishment. Once that wealth scales to the size of a small country's GDP or a major federal reserve, the status quo changes: ​The Demand to Dox: The public, media, and regulators will demand to know who the fuck is holding the keys. The pressure to legally unmask and locate them will be unprecedented. ​National Security Threat: Governments will not tolerate a trillion-dollar financial wildcard sitting under the radar. Intelligence agencies will be weaponized to track down the identity behind those genesis wallets under the guise of "national security" and regulation. ​Too Big to Be Hidden: It crosses the line from a cool cyberpunk story to a macroeconomic variable too massive to ignore. ​The "Dead Wallet" Copium ​The standard response to this is always: "Satoshi is dead" or "The keys are burned, so it doesn't matter." But that is pure cope. ​The blockchain doesn't know if someone is dead. Until those coins are cryptographically destroyed, they are a loaded gun pointed at the global economy. ​Imagine the absolute chaos the exact second an on-chain alert pops up showing 10 BTC moving out of a 2009 genesis block wallet. The market wouldn't just flash-crash; the psychological panic would shake the entire crypto thesis to its core. The mere possibility of movement makes it a ticking time bomb, and world powers know it. ​What is the Endgame? ​Can a decentralized, global reserve asset truly function smoothly if its largest single holder is a total ghost that could theoretically market-dump and crush economies on a whim? ​Does the world force Satoshi out of the shadows, or do you think the anonymity can actually survive that level of wealth and global scrutiny? ​What happens when the world demands to see the face behind the ultimate bank account? submitted by /u/Futuristic_Kid [link] [Kommentare]

I recently came across a very affordable 8115 45kv (0.3ohms phase R) motor kit which includes a wound stator and a steel magnet ring . Quickly modeled a mockup in Fusion : https://preview.redd.it/ckbo2a7d5h7h1.jpg?width=1043&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=40716922ce7ca2358503ede09badaa0f0de7417c https://preview.redd.it/rrtz8qvd5h7h1.jpg?width=1280&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9b356dfab5d5953781b3e0b4d9fcb25fb3f2a37c Instead of using a pressfitted central shaft like most bldc do , i opted for a pilot diameter directly on the rotor to locate it on the 52x40x7 bearing (possible stiffnest improvement ?) then use 2 bolts ,circular nuts, a plate to preload and lock the bearings and rotor to the stator. I'm also using a very shallow bearing seats with both 7mm thick bearings lightly-pressfitted in to shallow 3mm seats. Would this work or this housing design need to be scrapped immediately ? Additional images : https://preview.redd.it/hb1u55ef6h7h1.jpg?width=813&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1d6de3288f287c2ab477c0350d2e3d21858b8553 https://preview.redd.it/6qsu8zdf6h7h1.jpg?width=886&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6a3137c5578289c86b78c7bdc9c7fd8c952ec8b7 submitted by /u/lekhoi_trym_to [link] [Kommentare]

watching Strategy stack another 1,587 BTC and it hit me, MSTR is basically just a wrapper. you’re not buying software, you’re buying exposure to Saylor’s conviction bet, tradeable on an exchange. the company became a vehicle for backing a thesis early. so here’s what i can’t stop chewing on: if a corporation can tokenize its balance sheet into something you can buy a piece of… why is it weird for a person to do the same with their future output? a creator’s attention/audience is real economic value. the only reason you’ve never been able to “buy early” into a creator the way you buy MSTR for BTC exposure is that the rails didn’t exist. now they kind of do. the version of this i find interesting works like: a creator launches a token, but they only ever get paid in SOL/USDC, tips, content unlocks never their own token. so there’s no founder bag to dump. the token’s a key to their stuff and a bet that their market cap climbs as they grow. you’re early to a person the way MSTR holders were early to Saylor’s BTC call. the obvious holes: a person is way more volatile than a balance sheet, and “betting on a human” gets weird fast. but is it actually structurally different from buying a company that’s just a wrapper around one guy’s conviction? or is Saylor allowed to do it because it’s a corp, and a creator doing the same is automatically a “scam”? submitted by /u/alexsssaint [link] [Kommentare]