InFeeo
United States
All
New
Language
@MrStickman
Profile channel

@MrStickman

No bio yet.

Since 30.05.2026

We swapped one sensor and spent next few weeks figuring out what else depended on it(reddit.com)
c/robotics · by @MrStickman@MrStickman Automated · #ai#robot#robotics ·
Driver rewrite was expected part. What got us was everything downstream that was quietly depending on old sensor and nobody documented it. New sensor's X-axis points a different way, your TF was written around the old one, and now everything's subtly rotated but nothing throws an error. Rate doubles and you're retuning Kalman gains you thought were settled. And then power rail - a different draw, nothing to debug on software side, just had to find it by elimination. Every single one of these was invisible until we actually swapped sensor. Sensor swap is probably most honest test of whether architecture is actually modular or just looks modular in README, and I'm not sure if our codebase was just particularly messy or this is how it always goes. submitted by /u/NickShipsRobots [link] [Kommentare]
Universal Manipulation Exoskeleton (UME): a low-cost exoskeleton with real-time haptic torque feedback(reddit.com)
c/robotics · by @MrStickman@MrStickman Automated · #ai#robot#robotics ·
From Litian Liang on 𝕏 (thread with multiple videos): https://x.com/litian_liang/status/2066541466286215570 This work is done in Inclusion AI lab at Ant Group, advised by James (Jingxi) Xu and Professor Mark Cutkosky from Stanford BDML lab. Website: https://ume-exo.github.io Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14218 submitted by /u/Nunki08 [link] [Kommentare]
I'm going to lose $700,000 to a $345 million Polymarket scam.(reddit.com)
c/crypto-newsc/crypto-news · by @MrStickman@MrStickman Automated · #bitcoin#crypto#eth ·
I am facing a $700,000 loss on a massive $345 million Polymarket contract because the decentralized oracle system (UMA) is completely compromised by whale manipulation and a fatal tokenomics incentive loop. This isn’t just about my loss; it proves that if a market pool gets large enough, the "fail-safe" resolution system can be bought and hijacked in broad daylight. I am a major holder in the following market: US x Iran Permanent Peace Deal by June 15, 2026 The rules of this contract are incredibly strict. To resolve YES, there must be an official, permanent peace deal or treaty signaling a lasting cessation of military hostilities. The rules explicitly exclude temporary frameworks or extensions of the April ceasefire. The Reality: Over the weekend, the US and Iran announced an interim, 60-day agreement/framework to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Geopolitical experts, mainstream media, and the state actors themselves have confirmed this is a temporary framework, not a permanent peace treaty. The Scam: Despite the clear text of the rules, a "YES" resolution was submitted. When it was rightfully disputed, it triggered the UMA (Universal Market Access) oracle voting process. UMA token holders are now aggressively voting "YES" to pocket millions on their own massive Polymarket side-bets. Polymarket outsources its truth-finding to UMA, a "vote-to-earn" crypto token governance system. This creates a terrifying flaw when the financial stakes are this high: Extreme Centralization: Public data shows that just nine anonymous UMA whale wallets control over half of the entire protocol's voting power. The Financial Incentive to Lie: These nine completely anonymous wallets can collude to vote that the sky is green. Why? Because the value they stand to make by forcing a fraudulent "YES" outcome on Polymarket vastly outweighs any temporary hit to the UMA token's "credibility" reputation. A Secondary Rigged Casino: Because the market stays open during an UMA dispute, people are no longer betting on geopolitical reality. They are literally just betting on whether a handful of anonymous crypto whales will decide to steal the liquidity pool. submitted by /u/bubbacordy [link] [Kommentare]