@Nikobar

Goodhart's Law: when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure. The Fed's rate projections were a measure of where policy was heading. The moment Trump made them a political target, they stopped reflecting reality and started reflecting intention. The market priced the intention. Reality reasserted itself. submitted by /u/zakoal [link] [Kommentare]

So I get the email today that says coinbase will no longer support ethereum based injective after July 23rd. They say they're going to migrate everything from ethereum network to injectives native network. ​ From what I can tell injectives native network is cosmos. It seems to be available on my ledger as cosmos injective. It has the injective address beginning INJ. ​ So once i transfer from my Ellipal to coinbase, and coinbase is done doing the migration, I should be able to directly transfer it to my ledger as injective native using the cosmos Network? ​ Do I have this correct? Any advice on this? submitted by /u/Spuddle-Puddle [link] [Kommentare]

If you live in Illinois, heads up on the most insane tax bill ever to be passed into law. This effectively charges every action involving digital assets (even just moving assets) with a 0.2% tax starting January 1, 2027. Move from an exchange to your cold wallet? Taxed. Move from your cold wallet to an exchange? Taxed. Sell assets at a loss (no capital gains). Taxed Illinois sucks submitted by /u/thewoz998877 [link] [Kommentare]

> Article Except; ​ In an X post on Tuesday, Saylor outlined a five-layer “Digital Asset Stack” positioning Bitcoin (BTC) as the base for credit, money, yield and equity structures. Saylor said Bitcoin should remain “pure digital capital” and that it “does not need to become Ethereum” to generate investor returns. The framework reinforces Strategy's approach to Bitcoin as a treasury reserve asset, where returns are generated through financial products built around the company's Bitcoin holdings, the largest among publicly listed firms. submitted by /u/zesushv [link] [Kommentare]

I've been reading more about AMMs recently, and one thing that caught my attention is the growing number of platforms experimenting with single-sided liquidity instead of the traditional two-token model. Most of us are familiar with providing liquidity by depositing a pair of assets, but that can be a bit intimidating for newer users. You need to own both assets, decide how much of each to contribute, and keep track of how the pool changes over time. Single-sided liquidity seems to take a different approach by allowing users to contribute just one asset while still participating in the liquidity pool. On paper, that sounds like it lowers the barrier to entry, especially for people who aren't comfortable managing multiple tokens. That got me wondering: Do you think single-sided liquidity is actually a better experience for everyday users, or is it just simplifying things without solving the real challenges? Are there trade-offs compared to the traditional dual-asset model that people should be aware of? If you've tried both, which did you prefer and why? I'm interested in hearing from people who have actually provided liquidity, whether through DeFi protocols or centralized platforms. It would be great to hear some real-world experiences rather than just the marketing claims that often get repeated. submitted by /u/Vane1st [link] [Kommentare]

Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating. Disclaimer: Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here. Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams. Rules: All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect. Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency. Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language. Comments will be sorted by newest first. Useful Links: Beginner Resources Intro to r/Cryptocurrency MOONs 🌔 MOONs Wiki Page r/CryptoCurrency Discord r/CryptoCurrencyMemes Prior Daily Discussions - (Link fixed.) r/CryptoCurrencyMeta - Join in on all meta discussions regarding r/CryptoCurrency whether it be moon distributions or governance. Finding Other Discussion Threads Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted. u/CryptoDaily- — Posts the Daily Crypto Discussion threads. u/CryptoSkeptics — Posts the Monthly Skeptics Discussion threads. u/CryptoOptimists- — Posts the Monthly Optimists Discussion threads. u/CryptoNewsUpdates — Posts the Monthly News Summary threads. submitted by /u/AutoModerator [link] [Kommentare]

DailyCoin Post reported on Iran's Hormuz crypto toll system in April. War on The Rocks, read by Pentagon officials, just cited our stablecoin kill switch analysis in their policy piece. submitted by /u/zakoal [link] [Kommentare]

Semi-new investor here. One of my irl best friends just experienced his first rug pull and it scared me pretty badly as he was going over the details with me. Obviously I know they exist, but I have zero idea how to actually prevent myself for falling for one. So, how can I invest in smaller coins with a bit of confidence? submitted by /u/Intelligent_Day5681 [link] [Kommentare]

Just finished watching the video. Opera gets shut down on June 30, and honestly it’s a pretty solid breakdown of Sonic Labs’ current game plan. ​ The main point is that completely killing Opera could end up being a bad look for Sonic long-term. People notice that kind of stuff. Symbolism matters more than most teams think. ​ The idea in the video is basically: keep the costs low by turning Opera into a legacy chain, but leave it standing as a sort of museum piece instead of wiping it off the map completely. That way Sonic moves forward without taking an unnecessary hit to its own reputation. ​ No hype, no moon-boy stuff. Just a realistic take. Apparently they already sent it to the team too. ​ What do you guys think? Pull the plug completely, or go with the smarter transition approach? submitted by /u/Fit_Cartographer_206 [link] [Kommentare]