Top voted comment every day will form a new coin mutation into this guy’s body until he becomes indistinguishable, basically. Just a l’il something to keep things fresh during the final innings of the bear. Enjoy! submitted by /u/GrannyRocketeer [link] [Kommentare]
TL;DR: While Grass pays you for sharing your unused internet bandwidth, ONTO Wallet pays you for sharing your verified human data. ONTO offers a more targeted approach for AI companies seeking high-quality training data, potentially leading to higher value yields. The DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks) narrative has exploded, with projects offering users ways to monetize their unused resources. Two popular projects in this space are Grass and ONTO Wallet, but they monetize entirely different assets. Grass operates by selling your unused internet bandwidth to AI companies, who use it to scrape the web for training data. You are essentially renting out your internet connection. ONTO Wallet, on the other hand, monetizes *you*. Specifically, it monetizes your verified human metadata. AI companies don't just need bandwidth to scrape data; they need cryptographic proof that the data they are training on comes from real humans. | Feature | Grass | ONTO Wallet | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Asset Monetized | Unused Internet Bandwidth | Verified Human Metadata | | Mechanism | Background Web Scraping | Opt-in Data Sharing via DID | | Value Proposition for AI | Access to raw web data | Access to verified, high-quality human data | | Privacy Focus | Anonymized routing | zkTLS and granular user consent | If you want to passively earn by sharing bandwidth, Grass is a solid option. But if you want to leverage your digital identity and provide the high-value, verified data that AI models desperately need to avoid model collapse, ONTO Wallet is the superior platform. Q: Does ONTO Wallet slow down my internet? A: No. ONTO does not share your bandwidth; it securely shares your verified metadata based on your consent. Q: Which one pays more? A: It depends on market demand. However, verified human data is increasingly seen as a premium asset compared to raw scraped data, which could translate to higher value over time. Q: Can I run both? A: Yes, they operate independently and monetize different resources. References [1] "DePIN and the AI Data Supply Chain," Messari Research, 2026. submitted by /u/Rc7xn [link] [Kommentare]
Tired of paying $30–$50/month just to see a company's ratios or balance sheet from 10 years ago, so I built StockNest. Completely free, no account required with 120+ metrics https://stocknest.app/ Data comes straight from SEC EDGAR filings with reconciliation passes to keep the numbers accurate and consistent. What it includes: Compare : chart any combination of metrics across up to 5 tickers simultaneously. 120+ metrics across income statements, balance sheets, cash flows, valuations, and margins. TTM, quarterly, and annual. 2Y / 5Y / 10Y / All-time ranges go back +25 years. Overview : Per-ticker overview with a weekly price chart (5Y/10Y range), TTM multiples, 5Y median metrics, historical valuation percentile rankings and percentile bands (0th/25th/50th/75th/100th), valuation range bars (P/E, P/S, P/OCF, P/FCF) with Undervalued / Fairly Valued / Overvalued verdicts, and a 52-week range. Insider trading transactions and analyst recommendations Score : A composite score across Profitability, Management, Growth, and Solvency. The score badge color is determined by the lowest-scoring category, making potential risk areas immediately visible DCF : pre-filled from historical data. EPS, FCF/share, or OCF/share. Tune growth rate, decay, terminal multiple, and discount rate. 5Y or 10Y horizon. Non-USD companies show everything in their reporting currency so the comparison stays apples-to-apples. Screener : filter by 25+ valuation, profitability, return, and health metrics. Sortable results, click any ticker to jump straight into a comparison. US-listed companies only for now. submitted by /u/rebel-capitalist [link] [Kommentare]
Anyway i have DCA today all of them lol submitted by /u/valthurn [link] [Kommentare]
AAIF just launced this month and it's tied to something something AI and politics. Anyone got any real info on it? I see Coinbase offers it already (which seems interesting.) https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/american-ai-fund submitted by /u/onemananswerfactory [link] [Kommentare]
Binance released 12.93 ETH before my country's investigation could even reach them. I accept my mistake, but I still don't believe this was a fair outcome. Binance ID: 18023508 Case ID: 2262356179 Order No: 22805267579357126656 Hello everyone, I'm sharing my experience because I hope it helps others avoid what happened to me, and because I genuinely believe this case raises important questions about how cross-border P2P disputes are handled. I have used Binance for about five years and completed many P2P trades without major issues. I understand the platform's rules, and I'm not here to claim that I did everything perfectly. Unfortunately, one trade changed everything. I opened a P2P order to buy 12.93 ETH (around €40,000). During the order, the seller told me inside the Binance chat that his bank account was blocked and asked me to pay through Payeer instead. He personally sent me the Payeer account details in the official Binance order chat. Believing I was following the seller's own payment instructions, I completed the payment immediately and uploaded full proof. Instead of releasing the ETH, the seller later claimed that his account had been hacked and that the money had gone to someone else. At that moment I realized this was no longer an ordinary P2P dispute. I immediately reported the case to the Turkish Cyber Crimes Prosecutor's Office. The prosecutor officially opened an investigation and issued a written order instructing Turkish cyber police to contact Binance through official law-enforcement channels and request that the disputed crypto remain frozen during the investigation. From that point on, I believed the legal process would be allowed to continue. Unfortunately, that never happened. I personally visited the cyber police office four different times asking whether Binance had been contacted. Every visit ended with the same answer: "Come back later." Eventually I was simply told to leave. While I was waiting for the authorities to complete their part of the process, Binance closed the dispute. Later Binance informed me that Vietnamese law enforcement had contacted them on behalf of the seller, but they had received nothing from Turkey. As a result, Binance released all 12.93 ETH back to the seller. The seller immediately withdrew the assets. My money was gone. I want to be completely honest about one important point. Yes, I made a mistake. I paid to the Payeer account that the seller sent me inside the Binance order chat instead of using the payment account shown on his Binance profile. I fully accept responsibility for making that mistake. I am not asking anyone to ignore Binance's rules or excuse my error. What has been extremely difficult for me to accept is what happened afterward. Once a criminal investigation had officially started, and Binance had been informed that legal proceedings were underway, I genuinely believed the disputed assets would remain frozen until law enforcement had a reasonable opportunity to communicate with Binance. Instead, the case was finalized before my country's authorities ever managed to send their request. That decision meant I permanently lost 12.93 ETH. This has been financially devastating for me. I am not sharing this to attack Binance or ask strangers for sympathy. I am sharing it because I believe users should know how vulnerable they can become when a dispute involves multiple countries and communication between authorities is delayed. If nothing else, I hope my experience encourages discussion about whether disputed assets should remain frozen when a documented criminal investigation is already in progress but international communication has not yet been completed. I have retained all evidence, including payment records, Binance chat logs, prosecutor documents, timestamps, and correspondence. Thank you for taking the time to read my story. submitted by /u/Next-Witness891 [link] [Kommentare]
> "The mainstream consensus on gold in 2026 has organized itself around a single, load-bearing thesis: central banks are buying at the fastest pace since the 1950s, this buying is structural and price-insensitive, and it constitutes a permanent floor under the gold price." submitted by /u/NoidoDev [link] [Kommentare]
