I sold my last startup to build to build GM Markets It makes the global equity market accessible as on-chain tokens. The core flows: connect, deposit, trade, withdraw, work end-to-end and are backed by 1:1 custody. But you should expect rough edges as we iterate quickly. Some surfaces are marked with a small "Beta" tag to flag where the experience is still evolving (e.g. leaderboard, the AI assistant, real-time chart data). Trade with funds you can afford to test even with adding any fund you can just get on the product test it and share the experience in th ecomments of DMs. Pls do share youe experience or anything that surprised you. submitted by /u/Economy-Mud-6626 [link] [Kommentare]

The last cycle for altcoins was very disappointing. One of the few chains that did reasonanly well was Solana, driven by the memecoin narrative. However, i believe that this stupid narrative is precisely why we didn't see gains across all the other blockchains. In my opinion, the only way to get wagmi back is for everyone to move away from memecoins, which have diluted the entire market and, to make matters worse, made the whole crypto space look like a dumb scam. I think we could turn last poor cycle into a period of double accumulation if the memecoin narrative were to disappear completely. Attention would then shift back to the major blockchains and we would get the attention of 2019/2020/2021. Whether it's ETH, ADA, VET, ICP, SUI, ALGO, XLM, AVAX, LTC, etc. - as long as it's a major blockchain, we would get that wagmi back. Wouldn't it be a lot cooler to have all the people win that stayed in the space instead of giving the next cycle again away to influencers and wannabie stars that scam with their memecoin? What's your take on this? submitted by /u/Timely-Fig2030 [link] [Kommentare]

While experimenting with GRPO training, I kept running this shit that when reward increases, it becomes difficult to tell whether the policy is genuinely improving or simply exploiting the reward function. So I built a small library called rewardspy that wraps an existing reward function and continuously monitors indicators that often precede reward hacking. It currently tracks things like rolling reward statistics, reward variance collapse, reward component imbalance, response length drift, reward slope changes, GRPO group collapse, anol. This is my first major RL project so I would absolutely love some technical advice Check it out here: https://github.com/AvAdiii/rewardspy submitted by /u/BaniyanChor [link] [Kommentare]

Binance released 12.93 ETH before my country's investigation could even reach them. I accept my mistake, but I still don't believe this was a fair outcome. Binance ID: 18023508 Case ID: 2262356179 Order No: 22805267579357126656 Hello everyone, I'm sharing my experience because I hope it helps others avoid what happened to me, and because I genuinely believe this case raises important questions about how cross-border P2P disputes are handled. I have used Binance for about five years and completed many P2P trades without major issues. I understand the platform's rules, and I'm not here to claim that I did everything perfectly. Unfortunately, one trade changed everything. I opened a P2P order to buy 12.93 ETH (around €40,000). During the order, the seller told me inside the Binance chat that his bank account was blocked and asked me to pay through Payeer instead. He personally sent me the Payeer account details in the official Binance order chat. Believing I was following the seller's own payment instructions, I completed the payment immediately and uploaded full proof. Instead of releasing the ETH, the seller later claimed that his account had been hacked and that the money had gone to someone else. At that moment I realized this was no longer an ordinary P2P dispute. I immediately reported the case to the Turkish Cyber Crimes Prosecutor's Office. The prosecutor officially opened an investigation and issued a written order instructing Turkish cyber police to contact Binance through official law-enforcement channels and request that the disputed crypto remain frozen during the investigation. From that point on, I believed the legal process would be allowed to continue. Unfortunately, that never happened. I personally visited the cyber police office four different times asking whether Binance had been contacted. Every visit ended with the same answer: "Come back later." Eventually I was simply told to leave. While I was waiting for the authorities to complete their part of the process, Binance closed the dispute. Later Binance informed me that Vietnamese law enforcement had contacted them on behalf of the seller, but they had received nothing from Turkey. As a result, Binance released all 12.93 ETH back to the seller. The seller immediately withdrew the assets. My money was gone. I want to be completely honest about one important point. Yes, I made a mistake. I paid to the Payeer account that the seller sent me inside the Binance order chat instead of using the payment account shown on his Binance profile. I fully accept responsibility for making that mistake. I am not asking anyone to ignore Binance's rules or excuse my error. What has been extremely difficult for me to accept is what happened afterward. Once a criminal investigation had officially started, and Binance had been informed that legal proceedings were underway, I genuinely believed the disputed assets would remain frozen until law enforcement had a reasonable opportunity to communicate with Binance. Instead, the case was finalized before my country's authorities ever managed to send their request. That decision meant I permanently lost 12.93 ETH. This has been financially devastating for me. I am not sharing this to attack Binance or ask strangers for sympathy. I am sharing it because I believe users should know how vulnerable they can become when a dispute involves multiple countries and communication between authorities is delayed. If nothing else, I hope my experience encourages discussion about whether disputed assets should remain frozen when a documented criminal investigation is already in progress but international communication has not yet been completed. I have retained all evidence, including payment records, Binance chat logs, prosecutor documents, timestamps, and correspondence. Thank you for taking the time to read my story. submitted by /u/Next-Witness891 [link] [Kommentare]

​ So I got talked into investing in this crypto project called GTBS (Gatbits) and the more I look into it, something doesn't feel right. They promised ₹50k a month for putting in ₹5 lakh, and claimed the whole thing is backed by some Sheikh in Dubai. But when I dug deeper, I found some weird stuff: The partnership letter from the Sheikh's office appears to be fake. I can't figure out where the ₹50k/month actually comes from. It doesn't add up mathematically. Has anyone else invested in this? Are you actually making money or getting paid out? Or is this the usual Ponzi thing where early investors get paid from new money coming in? Would appreciate if anyone has actual info about this project or if I'm just paranoid. submitted by /u/No-Situation4626 [link] [Kommentare]

My question on live continual learning use cases was removed by moderators here because they think i asked basic level question about live continual learning which i thought is a frontier level research. But anyways. Is anyone interested in talking about continual learning (live) and catastrophic forgetting? submitted by /u/fourwheels2512 [link] [Kommentare]

I am the author of the original Bitcoin Rainbow Chart on blockchaincenter.net. As you may know... It is dead! We already added a new color to prolong its life but even that could not save it. BUT: The model behind the original Rainbow Chart was from 2014...we now have 12 more years of data to fit a curve... And thats what I did. The new Bitcoin Rainbow is dynamic which means it calculates a new regression up until the current day... So if we make a lower low, it will adapt. The Bitcoin Rainbow Chart is dead, long live the Bitcoin rainbow Chart submitted by /u/blockchaincenter_de [link] [Kommentare]

A quick google search of crypto lendin companies that went bust: Several major cryptocurrency lending companies collapsed during the 2022 market downturn, setting off a domino effect across the industry. The highest-profile failures include: BlockFi: Filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in November 2022 after the collapse of FTX, which had previously extended a credit line to keep the lender afloat. Celsius Network: Filed for bankruptcy in July 2022 due to a massive liquidity crisis triggered by falling crypto prices and heavy exposure to the collapsed Terra ecosystem. Voyager Digital: Filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in July 2022 following massive defaults by the crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC). Genesis Global: The prominent institutional crypto lender filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in January 2023 after suffering catastrophic losses from its loans to 3AC and Alameda Research (FTX). These bankruptcies resulted in tens of billions of dollars in investor losses and highlighted the risks of extreme interconnectedness and a lack of regulatory safeguards in the crypto lending space. No body know how solvent Nexo is as a crypto lender. They could be 100% legit and 100% solvent. But if they are not 100% solvent (like Celsius, Voyager, Blockfi, Genesis), without a Mica license, all who use Nexo in the EU will need to leave and taking their crypto with them. That will be a stress test for them. submitted by /u/punishGoalhanging [link] [Kommentare]