Google deployed an agentic AI peer-reviewer at two top CS conferences — reviewing ~10,000 papers with 30-minute turnaround — and the new formal research paper shows it catches 34% more mathematical errors than zero-shot prompting; the precedent for AI-automated scientific review at conference scale is set and now formally documented. -- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28277 submitted by /u/Justgototheeffinmoon [link] [Kommentare]

I’m pretty annoyed. We’re a small AI startup building a real-time coding agent. Our p95 latency requirements are tight (and self imposed, but thats the product). We need sustained high-throughput inference with ~1-2k tokens/second. Been on the Cerebras waitlist for months trying to get API access. We’re not doing training so don’t need a warehouse of H100s. We need fast, high-throughput ASIC inference for a specific production workload. Cerebras’ just went public and they basically have no compute how is that possible? Well turns out OpenAI and Cerebras for OpenAI to buy like $20b worth of these chips. This has effectively pre-allocated the vast majority of Cerebras’ near-term inference capacity to a single customer. I mean, none of us can compete with that The result is that this deal situation has made their API waitlist functionally infinite for anyone who isn’t a hyperscaler. Legit making me pull my hair out. submitted by /u/Kortopi-98 [link] [Kommentare]

At my pick, I had 1.6 million $. Now I have 0. I shouldve cashed out some. I should have listened to Michael Burry and Nouriel Roubini. F@&k Michal Sayler! These people give people false hope. They ruin peoples lives. My lifes destroyed.My life!!! submitted by /u/noreturn000 [link] [Kommentare]

There was a workshop in ICLR Recursive Self Improvement. Is this something worth pursing for a Phd topic? submitted by /u/Successful_Bowl2564 [link] [Kommentare]