Channel
c/crypto-news
No description.
Owner @James · 1781 posts · 2 joined · Status active · Posting permission: Every logged-in user can post
All ETH ETFs up3-4% higher than BMNR . I thought bmnr was equal to 1.5x or am I confusing with MSTR? Either way wtf? Nice ETH day and this turd barely moves submitted by /u/Dip2Tip [link] [Kommentare]
watching Strategy stack another 1,587 BTC and it hit me, MSTR is basically just a wrapper. you’re not buying software, you’re buying exposure to Saylor’s conviction bet, tradeable on an exchange. the company became a vehicle for backing a thesis early. so here’s what i can’t stop chewing on: if a corporation can tokenize its balance sheet into something you can buy a piece of… why is it weird for a person to do the same with their future output? a creator’s attention/audience is real economic value. the only reason you’ve never been able to “buy early” into a creator the way you buy MSTR for BTC exposure is that the rails didn’t exist. now they kind of do. the version of this i find interesting works like: a creator launches a token, but they only ever get paid in SOL/USDC, tips, content unlocks never their own token. so there’s no founder bag to dump. the token’s a key to their stuff and a bet that their market cap climbs as they grow. you’re early to a person the way MSTR holders were early to Saylor’s BTC call. the obvious holes: a person is way more volatile than a balance sheet, and “betting on a human” gets weird fast. but is it actually structurally different from buying a company that’s just a wrapper around one guy’s conviction? or is Saylor allowed to do it because it’s a corp, and a creator doing the same is automatically a “scam”? submitted by /u/alexsssaint [link] [Kommentare]
Is there a website/indicator/app that helps you track how alts perform when bitcoin is going sideways, going up or going down. What I'm interested into seeing is if there's a pattern. I noticed that if certain alts dont fall that much when Bitcoin goes down, they tend to go up more once Bitcoin bounces. Similar rule applies in other way. It's hard for me to track this on the chart, best way I found to do it is to go on coinmarketcap and go on historical snapshot, but it's not exactly what I want. Also when I'm looking on Tradingview I can maybe track ETH, XRP or SOL like that, but can't track as many coins as I want like that. I'm completely rekt with alts, but I want to analyze and see which ones can potentially be good buy when the market bounces and which ones I can short when the market turns around and goes down again. submitted by /u/Impossible-Buyer6389 [link] [Kommentare]
Can anybody throw me a dollar on ETH so I can move my balance? I'll repay you plus some. Really i just need like 18 cents lol message me for my address. submitted by /u/LukeIsLostAF [link] [Kommentare]
I trade perps and spend hours staring at charts. There's always this dead zone under the chart that shows nothing. Figured that attention is worth something, so I built a thing. It's a browser extension that puts one small sponsored card in that empty space. You might see that 'NICHELOOM' ad there in the chart. This ad is never over the candles, you can collapse or dismiss it. Advertisers bid to show a card, and you keep 50% of the revenue, paid in USDC. It's open source so you can read exactly what it does before installing, it doesn't touch your wallet, trades, or positions. Only thing it ever asks for is a payout address if you want to get paid. Works on Hyperliquid, TradingView, Binance. It's early. The earnings are small right now (think a few dollars a week if you're active, not a paycheck) because it depends on advertiser demand, which I'm still building. Posting here because I genuinely want feedback from people who actually trade. Is the card annoying? useful? would you keep it? submitted by /u/Fearless_Run4 [link] [Kommentare]
If you walked through a marketplace thousands of years ago, you would have heard the exact same sales pitch Bitcoin promoters use today. Amulet sellers didn’t sell objects, but "fixes". They’d look a desperate buyer in the eye and say: Worried about your crops dying? This carved bone fixes it. Sick relative? This little stone fixes it. Terrified of bad luck? This scrap of cloth fixes it. In reality, those objects were just ordinary junk with zero power to fix anything. The only thing that had any power was the story, mixed with how desperate the buyer was for a solution. Today, Bitcoin promoters are running the exact same play, they’ve just moved the pitch from a dusty marketplace to the internet. They talk endlessly about the fixes Bitcoin delivers. It will end inflation and other financial problems. It will free you from corrupt banks and governments. It will give you unbreakable security, borderless money, and a true store of value no one can seize. Sounds powerful, right? Yet underneath the hype, Bitcoin is nothing more than fractions of an arbitrary number, 21 million, imagined by a guy on a cryptography forum and recorded in a decentralized spreadsheet. Just like the amulet, this has no actual power to fix anything. Financial problems are problems of bad, broken, or excessive obligations. Trust in money is trust that those obligations will be fulfilled. How on earth is holding a tiny decimal point of an imaginary number going to fix this? It's crazy to even think about it. Value storage? How is trading away assets to hold a number actually storing value? It is like joining a pyramid scheme and hoping you will get your investment back later from someone else. Freedom from government? You still have to pay taxes. You still obey the law. The government does not care how many satoshis you stack. Holding those numbers will not shield you from regulation, seizure, or political reality. Unbreakable security? That's a joke. In finance, security means protecting a claim born from obligations tracked by the system. Anywhere else, it means protecting a useful product. Bitcoin turns this into pure nonsense. All that intense encryption is literally just securing fractions of a number someone made up. It is exactly like installing a high-tech, triple-reinforced vault to protect the air inside. In short, holding fractions of an imagined number and having them stored across a bunch of random computers cannot fix a single real-world problem. Meanwhile, the people promoting this are doing great. Book authors, seminar hosts, exchange operators, and influencers make serious money by presenting Bitcoin as the ultimate fix for every financial ill. They thrive on the same human impulse that kept amulet sellers in business for thousands of years: hope mixed with fear, wrapped in a compelling narrative. So how is Bitcoin not just a digital amulet? The honest answer is that it is exactly that. It is the same ancient trick, updated with better marketing. Technology changed, human nature did not. The shape of the amulet evolved from carved bone to blockchain entry, but the game remains identical: sell belief, collect value. submitted by /u/BinaryLyric [link] [Kommentare]
so this exists now: a solana social app where every creator launches their own token, and your followers can buy a piece of you before you blow up. my brain immediately went “lol it’s memecoins with a face.” but i can’t stop thinking about it. like… we already tokenize everything else, art, treasuries, literal meme dogs. a creator’s future attention is real value too, it just never had a market before. is “a person” actually weirder to tokenize than a jpeg? then the gremlin in my head goes: early apes win, latecomers bag-hold, and what happens when the creator just stops posting lmao. so which is it, the endgame of the creator economy, or memecoins wearing a hoodie and pretending to be a startup? genuinely can’t decide. roast it. submitted by /u/alexsssaint [link] [Kommentare]