[Project] Open-source workcell evidence tool: physical event to regression test(reddit.com)

I released MetriPlane v0.2.0 and am preparing a SoftwareX research-software paper while finishing my MSc thesis. 3-minute demo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7U5nbBbGGbw Repo: https://github.com/Miko997/metriplane Zenodo DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20736619 MetriPlane is an observe-only physical-observability tool for bounded workcells. The v0.2.0 demo shows a replayed missing-tool event becoming: - physical event log - Cell Truth Report - evidence bundle - local bundle verification - generated regression test The goal is not robot control or safety certification. The goal is replayable evidence: what physically happened, what proves it, and whether the incident can become a repeatable software check. I am looking for technical feedback from robotics, simulation, manufacturing, digital-twin, and research-software people. Public reproduction issue: https://github.com/Miko997/metriplane/issues/6 I am especially interested in: Does the camera-free reproduction path work on other machines? Is the evidence-bundle / regression-test loop useful? Are the limitations clear enough? What should be validated next? Scope: - observe-only - planar/tagged assets - no robot or machine control - no safety certification - no marker-free tracking claim - no production deployment claim Useful feedback format: OS: Python version: doctor: pass/fail deterministic replay: pass/fail Atlas run: pass/fail bundle verify: pass/fail generated regression test: pass/fail Technical relevance: 2–5 sentences Main limitation: 1–2 sentences Critical feedback is preferred. submitted by /u/No-Editor-8797 [link] [Kommentare]