InFeeo
Language

PyTorch model running 170x slower on T4 vs A100. What could cause a bottleneck this extreme? [D](reddit.com)

×
Link preview PyTorch model running 170x slower on T4 vs A100. What could cause a bottleneck this extreme? [D] Hey everyone, Seeing a ~170× slowdown running a point-tracking model on an NVIDIA T4 compared to an A100. On A100 the tracker takes ~0.5 seconds per half-video. On T4 the same call takes ~85 seconds. Video is 47 frames at 256×256, batch 1. I expect a meaningful gap between these cards, but 170× feels too large to explain by generational hardware differences alone. Setup: Precision: pure FP32 Architecture: builds local 4D correlation volumes (dense matching between frames) followed by transformer layers for temporal context Already ruled out: GPU is at 99% utilization during the call (via nvidia-smi) Model is actually on GPU (torch.cuda.is_available() = True, device prints "cuda") Enabling torch.backends.cudnn.benchmark = True had no effect Same slowdown on two independent T4 machines, so it's not a driver/setup issue Given the architecture (4D correlations + transformers) and pure FP32 execution, what would cause a T4 to be this much slower than A100? What should I look for or profile first? submitted by /u/Future-Structure-296 [link] [Kommentare] reddit.com · reddit.com
Hey everyone, Seeing a ~170× slowdown running a point-tracking model on an NVIDIA T4 compared to an A100. On A100 the tracker takes ~0.5 seconds per half-video. On T4 the same call takes ~85 seconds. Video is 47 frames at 256×256, batch 1. I expect a meaningful gap between these cards, but 170× feels too large to explain by generational hardware differences alone. Setup: Precision: pure FP32 Architecture: builds local 4D correlation volumes (dense matching between frames) followed by transformer layers for temporal context Already ruled out: GPU is at 99% utilization during the call (via nvidia-smi) Model is actually on GPU (torch.cuda.is_available() = True, device prints "cuda") Enabling torch.backends.cudnn.benchmark = True had no effect Same slowdown on two independent T4 machines, so it's not a driver/setup issue Given the architecture (4D correlations + transformers) and pure FP32 execution, what would cause a T4 to be this much slower than A100? What should I look for or profile first? submitted by /u/Future-Structure-296 [link] [Kommentare]

Log in Log in to comment.

No comments yet.