A payment is still pending on my blockchain acc. I'm trying to contact them to get support. On support center, it's asking me to log in. I'm already logged in. So I log in again, and the loop repeats. So what should I do? submitted by /u/Ornery_Dependent250 [link] [Kommentare]

Anyone ever collect the same card, or same item on a game. Regardless of price fluctuations? For me it was old school runescape and gnome scarves, or for TCGs as a kid I liked collecting Dark magicians. I didn’t pay attention to the price at the local store. A dark magician was probably only $5 anyways lol… Now if I tell myself this with my shitty crypto coins, maybe I’ll have the same result in 39374 years as I did with my pokemon and Yugioh collections🤯 I’ll start, say it loud, I COLLECT POLKADOTS 😂 submitted by /u/PlasticTreeonaHill [link] [Kommentare]

Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating. Disclaimer: Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here. Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams. Rules: All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect. Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency. Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language. Comments will be sorted by newest first. Useful Links: Beginner Resources Intro to r/Cryptocurrency MOONs 🌔 MOONs Wiki Page r/CryptoCurrency Discord r/CryptoCurrencyMemes Prior Daily Discussions - (Link fixed.) r/CryptoCurrencyMeta - Join in on all meta discussions regarding r/CryptoCurrency whether it be moon distributions or governance. Finding Other Discussion Threads Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted. u/CryptoDaily- — Posts the Daily Crypto Discussion threads. u/CryptoSkeptics — Posts the Monthly Skeptics Discussion threads. u/CryptoOptimists- — Posts the Monthly Optimists Discussion threads. u/CryptoNewsUpdates — Posts the Monthly News Summary threads. submitted by /u/AutoModerator [link] [Kommentare]

MSTR would have to bankrupt itself twice over to cross from 60k to 59k. 60k is simply the new bottom. It's like buying in at $0. I don't want to say "there's nowhere to go but up" because that's a meme, but effectively 60k is the bottom and it can only go up from there. People don't understand how substantial the support structure is at 60k. It would require insane massive amounts of liquidation by every major investment firm that holds it to ever reach 59k. You are seeing it trade at the equivalent of a fresh start. submitted by /u/_BreakingGood_ [link] [Kommentare]

Wrote this hastily. A bit middle of the road, so curious what others think. Not a trader and historically not the best predictor of what the corn is going to do. Will sum responses with Claude. —- Buying here is tricky. $60K is the level to watch. If it doesn’t hold, prob a good buying opportunity in the $40s. Right now AI is the only game in town, which will continue to soak up all the speculative oxygen for the foreseeable future. Probably tops at some point, hard to say when. SpacEX IPO is going to be interesting to watch, as will OpenAI and Anthropic whenever those happen. There’s a chance newly created AI IPO wealth rotates back into BTC once AI valuations feel too rich for everyone and they want to diversify. BUT… As I said to you earlier, I never liked what Saylor is doing, and from what I gather he’s in a tough spot here (though I still don’t fully understand all the financial wizardry of it). Regardless, another cloud of uncertainty on the market. Then add quantum risk, and it’s hard for insto’s to allocate, which is what the market needs to go up. Gut says everything’s in the shitter at least until fall. So if you were going to take a flyer, that would be the time period to do it. But if there’s a big AI bubble pop, that probably takes everything down deeper, so that’s where your risk lies. submitted by /u/CryptigoVespucci [link] [Kommentare]

Trail of Bits just released "trailmix," five new quantum circuits for the hardest step in Shor's algorithm: elliptic-curve point addition. They beat Google's and every prior published circuit on the efficiency frontier, including a new low-qubit record at around 1,066 logical qubits. Link: https://x.com/trailofbits/status/2062980523232805164 The attack comes down to running that point-addition step billions of times, so a cheaper step means a smaller, faster quantum computer can do the job. The curve being optimized, secp256k1, secures Bitcoin, Ethereum, and most coins, so every improvement is another tick toward "Q-Day," the day a large enough quantum computer exists. No machine can do it today; the point is how fast the gap is closing. Shor's exploits a one-way function. Your public key is derived from your private key in a way that is easy forward and effectively irreversible on a classical computer, but Shor's reverses it on a quantum computer by turning the secret into a hidden repeating pattern that interference surfaces all at once. Ordinary arithmetic then recovers the private key. Breaking ECDSA is not exotic. It is the textbook use case quantum computers were designed for, and the algorithm has been public for over thirty years. No further breakthrough is required. Once a large enough fault-tolerant, general-purpose quantum computer exists, breaking crypto is just running a known program on it: no new physics, no special crypto-breaking hardware, nothing left to invent. What is left is building the hardware and shrinking the circuit. That second part is already a public, ongoing effort: the open challenge at ecdsa.fail (https://www.ecdsa.fail) is a live leaderboard where contributors, including AI agents, compete to make the point-addition circuit leaner, and submissions have already pushed below Google's numbers. Once standard quantum hardware crosses the size threshold, configuring a circuit to break the key is the easy part; that piece is already well understood and getting leaner by the week. The risk to holders is direct. The moment a public key is exposed on-chain, by spending or reusing an address, it can be targeted, and coins already sitting behind an exposed key cannot be retroactively protected. It is the crypto version of "harvest now, crack later." The fix is quantum-safe signatures, hash-based or lattice-based schemes that Shor's has no shortcut against. NIST has already standardized them. One chain was built this way from the start. QRL has been quantum-safe since its 2018 genesis, using hash-based signatures Shor's cannot break. Its upcoming upgrade, QRL 2.0, extends that as a proof-of-stake, energy-efficient, EVM-compatible network where existing Solidity contracts port over with minimal changes. It signs with ML-DSA-87, NIST's highest post-quantum security tier (Level 5), and it is crypto-agile, able to adopt new post-quantum algorithms without a contentious fork; it has already moved its entire signature stack up to a stronger level in about two weeks. Testnet V2 has been live since March 2026, Halborn audited the cryptography library with no vulnerabilities found, and Trail of Bits is auditing the full protocol, with mainnet targeted for 2026 after the remaining audits. Its throughput benchmarks land in Ethereum's range even though post-quantum signatures run tens of times larger than ECDSA's. submitted by /u/alami9 [link] [Kommentare]

Hear me out on this. I was thinking about the ultimate end-game of hyperbitcoinization, and I stumbled into a bizarre paradox. If the Lightning Network becomes as fast, cheap, and seamless as Bitcoin maxis hope it will, could it actually end up undermining the very security of Bitcoin itself? Think about the onboarding process. Right now, the goal is to get everyone onto Layer 2 because we all know the base layer can't scale to handle global, day-to-day commerce. But here is the catch: once a user is successfully onboarded into a Lightning channel, why would they ever leave? If people move to Layer 2 and are just exchanging off-chain IOUs indefinitely, it creates a fatal economic flaw for the base layer: The Fee Market Collapse: Bitcoin's long-term security budget relies entirely on transaction fees replacing the block subsidy. But if most daily transactions happen off-chain on Lightning, L1 transaction volume effectively dries up. Fewer L1 transactions means plummeting fee revenue for miners. If mining ceases to be profitable, the network's hashrate drops, making the entire foundational ledger vulnerable to 51% attacks. The ultimate irony is that the better Lightning gets, the less economic incentive anyone has to interact with the base layer that secures it. By solving the scalability problem, they might accidentally be engineering a slow-motion vampire attack on Bitcoin's foundational security. Change my mind. submitted by /u/Good-Book-6912 [link] [Kommentare]