Could Intel's Foundry efforts be starting to pay off?
One developer, team-quality code — powered by multi-agent AI
A German regional court has ruled that Google is directly liable for the content of its AI search overviews. According to the court, previous limited liability protections for search engine operators don't apply to AI overviews. In this case, Google's AI had falsely linked two publishers to fraud and made claims that didn't appear in any of the linked sources. The ruling could set a precedent for AI-generated content liability worldwide.
Connect EHRs and healthcare systems effortlessly with iNTERFACEWARE’s Iguana engine. Scalable data integration trusted by healthcare leaders worldwide.
Managed hosting for CraftBot. Spin up a private, persistent CraftBot agent in the cloud and manage it from one dashboard.
The Genesis sim video got me thinking: what does it actually take to build scenes like that (apart from gaussian splat part) with such accuracy, at scale? Asset and scene generation is one of the biggest bottlenecks in robot training. NVIDIA GR00T, Helix, HumanPlus, and ASAP all show the same pattern: more diverse scenarios lead to better sim-to-real transfer. But generating physically accurate objects and scenes takes time. Four platforms are working on this in 2026. Here's how they compare: 1. Rigyd: Agentic pipeline, best for on-demand scale and new types of objects Takes raw 3D (.glb, .fbx, .obj), images, or text and outputs calibrated OpenUSD + MJCF in ~2 minutes per asset with SimReady asset validator baked in. Generates full interactable scenes with per-object decomposition. Native Isaac Sim and MuJoCo support. Non-rigid and articulated objects are stated in the roadmap. The pipeline is agentic end-to-end, so no per-asset manual work. Good fit for teams that need to move fast with on-demand assets. 2. Lightwheel: High fidelity articulated objects, SimReady catalog Strong catalog of high-fidelity articulated assets and a SimReady library used by large enterprise customers. Per-asset visual and physical quality is high. USD and MJCF support via open-source converters. Good fit if you need a curated, validated catalog. Less flexible for new use cases or object categories outside their existing library. Catalog growth follows a curation model rather than an agentic pipeline. 3. NVIDIA Edify: Generative 3D, physics added separately Generates high-quality 3D meshes from text or image in under 2 minutes. Trained on licensed data, enterprise-safe. Tight Omniverse integration. The gap: it produces visual geometry, not SimReady assets. Physics, collision geometry, and USDPhysics schemas need to be added downstream before the asset is usable for robot training. Works well as an upstream step paired with a SimReady pipeline. 4. Moonlake: World modeling agent approach Acts directly inside Blender, automating the creation of articulated assets, physics-validated scenes, and complex environments rather than per-asset annotation. The approach is promising for research but production-grade Isaac Sim / MuJoCo integration is not there yet. If successful, world models could collapse scene generation and policy training into a single learning loop. What I think actually matters for sim-to-real transfer (ranked by impact): Per-object physics accuracy within the domain-randomization band Scene diversity (variation of scenes the policy sees during training) Visual fidelity (matters most for camera-only policies, less for contact-rich manipulation) How to choose: Need to scale across many object categories fast → Rigyd Need a validated catalog of articulated assets for known use cases → Lightwheel Need high-quality visual 3D in the NVIDIA ecosystem and will add physics downstream → Edify Researching end-to-end learned simulation → Moonlake For most teams the practical pattern is Rigyd for the long tail + hand-authored or Lightwheel assets for the few hero objects your scenario depends on. Both output standard OpenUSD/MJCF so they compose cleanly. Questions for the community: What's missing from this comparison? For those running training: where does asset prep actually bottleneck you? Image Credit: Genesis AI submitted by /u/yektabasak [link] [Kommentare]
TripoSplat converts a single 2D image into high-quality and variable number of 3D Gaussians, developed by TripoAI. - VAST-AI-Research/TripoSplat
When you press the power button on the SpacemiT K3 Pico-ITX, Ubuntu 26.04 appears on the serial console about 30 seconds later. Between those two events, five distinct software layers run in sequence, each one handing off to the next. Understanding what each layer does - and why it exists - matters the moment something goes wrong, or the moment you want to put a different OS on the board.
NotebookLM’s latest upgrades deliver new agentic capabilities and more advanced reasoning to tackle complex research projects.
㰡ⴭ⁇汯扡氠獩瑥⁴慧 杴慧猩⁇潯杬攠䅮慬祴楣猠ⴭ㸍਼獣物灴獹湣牣㴢桴瑰猺⼯睷眮杯潧汥瑡杭慮慧敲潭⽧瑡术橳㽩搽啁ⴱ㌶㠸㌳㤰ⴱ∾㰯獣物灴㸍਼獣物灴㸍ਠ⁷楮摯眮摡瑡䱡祥爠㴠睩湤潷慴慌慹敲⁼簠孝㬍ਠ畮捴楯渠杴慧⠩筤慴慌慹敲畳栨慲杵浥湴猩㭽ഊ†杴慧⠧橳✬敷⁄慴攨⤩㬍ਠ瑡木❣潮晩朧Ⱐ❕䄭ㄳ㘸㠳㌹〭ㄧ⤻ഊ㰯獣物灴㸍਼⅄佃呙偅⁈呍䰠偕䉌䥃•⽗㍃⼯䑔䐠䡔䵌‴⸰⁔牡湳楴楯湡氯⽅丢㸍਼桴浬㸼桥慤㸼瑩瑬放䉅剋午䥒䔠䡁呈䅗䅙⁉乃⸼⽴楴汥㸍਼浥瑡潮瑥湴㴢瑥硴⽨瑭氻桡牳整㵵湩捯摥∠桴瑰ⵥ煵楶㴢䍯湴敮琭呹灥∾ഊ㱭整愠湡浥㴢䝅久剁呏刢潮瑥湴㴢䵓䡔䵌‸⸰〮㘰〱⸱㠸㈸∾㰯桥慤㸍਼扯摹楮欽∣㠰〰㠰∠执捯汯爽∣晦晦晦∠瑥硴㴢⌰〰〸〢⁶汩湫㴢⍦昰〰〢㸼戾㱦潮琠獩穥㴢㘢㸍਼瀠慬楧渽≣敮瑥爢㹂㰯景湴㸼景湴楺攽∴∾䕒䭓䡉剅‼⽦潮琾㱦潮琠獩穥㴢㘢㹈㰯景湴㸼景湴ੳ楺攽㐾䅔䡁坁夠㰯景湴㸼景湴楺攽∲∾䥎䌮㱢爾㌵㔵⁆慲湡洠却牥整㱢爾佭慨愬⁎䔠㘸ㄳㄼ⽦潮琾㱢爾佦晩捩慬⁈潭攠偡来㰯戾㱦潮琠ഊ獩穥㴱㸦湢獰㬼⽰㸼⽦潮琾ഊ㱨爾ഊ㱰汩杮㴢捥湴敲∾ഊ㱣敮瑥爾ഊ㱴慢汥潲摥爽∰∠捥汬獰慣楮朽∰∠睩摴栽∹〥∾ഊ†㱴扯摹㸍ਠ‼瑲㸍ਠ†‼瑤敩杨琽∵㔢⁶慬楧渽≴潰∠睩摴栽∵〥∾ഊ†††㱵氾ഊ††††㱬椾㱡牥昽≭敳獡来瑭氢㹁⁍敳獡来牯洠坡牲敮⁅⸠䉵晦整琼⽡㸠ഊ††㰯汩㸼⽵氾㰯瑤㸍ਠ†㱴搠桥楧桴㴢㐵∠癡汩杮㴢瑯瀢⁷楤瑨㴢㔰┢㸍ਠ††‼畬㸍ਠ†††‼汩㸼愠桲敦㴢睥扦牡畤摦∾䙲慵摵汥湴⁃污業猠剥条牤楮朠䵲⸠䉵晦整琧猠䕮摯牳敭敮瑳映䥮癥獴浥湴⁐牯摵捴猠慮搠偯汩瑩捡氠䍡湤楤慴敳㰯愾ഊ††††††㰯汩㸼⽵氾㰯瑤㸼⽴爾ਠ‼瑲㸍ਠ†‼瑤敩杨琽∴㔢⁶慬楧渽≴潰∠睩摴栽∵〥∾ഊ†††㱵氾ഊ††††㱬椾㱡牥昽≲数潲瑳瑭氢㹁湮畡氠♡浰㬠䥮瑥物洠剥灯牴猼⽡㸠㱢爾㱦潮琠ഊ††††獩穥㴱㹕灤慴敤⁍慹′Ⱐ㈰㈶㱢爾㰯景湴㸼⽬椾㰯畬㸼⽴搾ഊ††㱴搠桥楧桴㴢㐵∠癡汩杮㴢瑯瀢⁷楤瑨㴢㔰┢㸍ਉठ‼畬㸍ਠ†††‼汩㸼愠桲敦㴢湥睳⼲〲㙮敷献桴浬∾乥睳⁒敬敡獥猠晲潭⁂敲歳桩牥⁈慴桡睡礠慮搠晲潭⁗慲牥渠䉵晦整琼⽡㸠㱢爾ਠ†††‼景湴楺攽ㄾ啰摡瑥搠䵡礠㌱Ⱐ㈰㈶㰯景湴㸼⽬椾㰯畬㸼⽴搾㰯瑲㸍ਠਉഊ†㱴爾ഊ††㱴搠桥楧桴㴢㐵∠癡汩杮㴢瑯瀢⁷楤瑨㴢㔰┢㸍ਠ††‼畬㸍ਠ†††‼汩㸼愠ഊ††††桲敦㴢桴瑰㨯⽷睷散潶⽣杩ⵢ楮⽢牯睳攭敤条爿捯浰慮礽扥牫獨楲攫桡瑨慷慹♡浰㭭慴捨㴦慭瀻䍉䬽♡浰㭦楬敮畭㴦慭瀻却慴攽♡浰㭃潵湴特㴦慭瀻卉䌽♡浰㭯睮敲㵥硣汵摥♡浰㭆楮搽䙩湤⭃潭灡湩敳♡浰㭡捴楯渽来瑣潭灡湹∾䱩湫ਠ†††⁴漠卅䌠䙩汩湧猼⽡㸠㰯汩㸼⽵氾㰯景湴㸼⽴搾ഊ††㱴搠桥楧桴㴢㐵∠癡汩杮㴢瑯瀢⁷楤瑨㴢㔰┢㸍ਠ††‼畬㸍ਠ††††㱬椾㱡牥昽≳桡牥桯汤瑭氢㹁湮畡氠䵥整楮朠䥮景牭慴楯渼⽡㸠㱢爾㱦潮琠ഊ††††獩穥㴱㹕灤慴敤⁁灲楬′〬′〲㘼扲㸼⽦潮琾ഊउउ़⽬椾㰯畬㸼⽴搾㰯瑲㸍ਠ†㱴爾ഊ††㱴搠桥楧桴㴢㐵∠癡汩杮㴢瑯瀢⁷楤瑨㴢㔰┢㸍ਉ़畬㸍ਠ†††‼汩㸼愠桲敦㴢汥瑴敲猯汥瑴敲献桴浬∾坡牲敮⁂畦晥瑴❳⁌整瑥牳⁴漠䉥牫獨楲攠ഊ††††卨慲敨潬摥牳㰯愾‼扲㸼景湴楺攽∱∾啰摡瑥搠䙥扲畡特′㈬′〲㔼扲㸼⽦潮琾ഊउउउठ㰯汩㸼⽵氾㰯瑤㸍ਠ†‼瑤敩杨琽∴㔢⁶慬楧渽≴潰∠睩摴栽∵〥∾ഊउ㱵氾ഊ††††㱬椾㱡牥昽≬整瑥牳⽧敡汥瑴敲献桴浬∾䝲敧⁁扥氧猠䱥瑴敲猠瑯⁂敲歳桩牥⁓桡牥桯汤敲猼⽡㸍ਉउ़扲㸼景湴楺攽∱∾啰摡瑥搠䙥扲畡特′㠬′〲㘼扲㸼⽦潮琾㱢爾㰯景湴㸍ਉउठ†‼⽬椾㰯畬㸼⽴搾㰯瑲㸍਼瑲㸍ਠ†‼瑤敩杨琽∴㔢⁶慬楧渽≴潰∠睩摴栽∵〥∾ഊ†††㱵氾ഊ††††㱬椾㱡牥昽≓灥捩慬䱥瑴敲猯坅䉃呍䱴爮桴浬∾印散楡氠䱥瑴敲猠晲潭⁗慲牥渠☠䍨慲汩攠剅㩐慳琬⁐牥獥湴湤⁆畴畲攼⽡㸠㰯汩㸼⽵氾㰯瑤㸍ਠ†‼瑤敩杨琽∵㔢⁶慬楧渽≴潰∠睩摴栽∵〥∾ഊ†††㱵氾ഊ††††㱬椾㱡牥昽≷敳捯⽗敳捯䡯浥瑭氢㹃桡牬楥⁍畮来爧猠䱥瑴敲猠瑯⁗敳捯⁓桡牥桯汤敲猼⽡㸼扲㸼⽦潮琾ഊउउ††㰯汩㸼⽵氾㰯瑤㸼⽴爾ഊऍਉഊऍਉउऍਠ‼瑲㸍ਠ†‼瑤敩杨琽∴㔢⁶慬楧渽≴潰∠睩摴栽∵〥∾ഊउ㱵氾ഊ††††㱬椾㱡牥昽≳畢猯獵扬楮歳瑭氢㹌楮歳⁴漠䉥牫獨楲攠佰敲慴楮朠䍯浰慮楥猼⽡㸠㱢爾㱦潮琠獩穥㴢ㄢ㸼扲㸼⽦潮琾㰯汩㸼⽵氾㰯瑤㸍ਠ†‼瑤敩杨琽∴㔢⁶慬楧渽≴潰∠睩摴栽∵〥∾ഊउ㱵氾ഊ††††㱬椾㱡牥昽≢桥湥牧礯扨敮敲杹灲敳敮瑡瑩潮献桴浬∾䉥牫獨楲攠䡡瑨慷慹⁅湥牧礠䥮癥獴潲⁐牥獥湴慴楯湳㰯愾ഊउउ़⽬椾㰯畬㸼⽴搾㰯瑲㸍ਠ‼瑲㸍ਠ†‼瑤敩杨琽∴㔢⁶慬楧渽≴潰∠睩摴栽∵〥∾ഊ†††㱵氾ഊ††††㱬椾㱡牥昽≧潶敲港杯癥牮瑭氢㹃潲灯牡瑥⁇潶敲湡湣攼⽡㸠㱢爾㱦潮琠ഊ††††獩穥㴱㸼扲㸼⽬椾㰯畬㸼⽴搾ഊ††㱴搠桥楧桴㴢㐵∠癡汩杮㴢瑯瀢⁷楤瑨㴢㔰┢㸍ਉ㱵氾ഊ††††㱬椾㱡牥昽≢牫獨…
Teams struggled to produce intent. AI let them think they could skip it.
