@Body

Earlier this month, a German court ruled that Google is liable for its AI search summaries. Rejecting defenses like “users can check for themselves,” and that they generally know “that information generated with AI should not be blindly trusted,” the court held that the AI’s summaries are reflections of the company and “above all an expression of Google’s business activities.” This is the latest skirmish in a decades-old battle over internet publishing. Historically, there were two different types of information distributors: carriers and publishers. A phone company is a carrier. It’ll transmit whatever you say, even discussions about committing a crime. Words are words, and the phone company does not know—nor is it liable for—the words you choose to speak. A newspaper, on the other hand, is a publisher. It decides the words it publishes, and what quotes to include in its articles. If those words or quotes are defamatory or otherwise illegal, it’s liable...

A fully local personal agent that watches your screen.

I'm just making this post to see if anyone else using a Ledger hardware wallet is unable to connect and sign transactions on desktop with Rabby on Google Chrome. On the 18th, I contacted Rabby's support through their Discord/GitHub, but I haven't received any proper update other than, "Have you tried contacting Google Chrome support?", which I thought was a pointless question with no follow up questions and It still doesn't work, so I just wanted to see if I'm on my own with this issue. I like Rabby Wallet, but their support staff are completely useless at relaying serious issues to whoever can actually sort them out. My Ledger works fine and allows me to connect and sign using Rabby on other browsers and whilst using other wallets, but it only takes issue with Rabby on Chrome. submitted by /u/Sam_Loopring_eth [link] [Kommentare]

Hi all, I’m working on a research project exploring how stateless LLM-based chatbots handle long conversations and whether important earlier information is still reliably retained over time. My idea is to: Run a chatbot using an LLM API without any external memory system Introduce key facts early in a long conversation Continue with many unrelated messages (hundreds of turns) Later test whether the model can still correctly recall those facts at different intervals I’m planning to measure recall accuracy and how it changes as the conversation grows. Before I go deeper, I’d really appreciate feedback on: Is this a valid way to evaluate long-context memory limits? Are there better benchmarks or methods already used for this? What metrics would make this more rigorous and convincing? Any suggestions or criticism are welcome. I’m trying to make the evaluation as solid as possible before building it out. Thanks! submitted by /u/QuietAccountant4237 [link] [Kommentare]

I have been in crypto space since 2018. I saw many OGs at that time quit. Never feel disappointed like now. Even in last bear market when btc hits 10k, I'm still opptimistic. I'm still holding but I'm not buying dip. With the same money, I would rather put into AI stock and hold another 3 years. submitted by /u/Yike_Pp [link] [Kommentare]

In 2022, I wrote about the damning fall of events tech company Pollen, founded by Callum Negus-Fancey. The short of it: Pollen seemed to have pulled off the improbable feat of building a business in the notoriously low margin industry of events, surviving Covid-19, and building a solid

GSD Task Manager is a private Eisenhower Matrix for web, iPhone, iPad, and Mac. Sort urgent from important, keep tasks on your device, and start without an account.

Fill out your own 2026 World Cup bracket — group winners, the best third-placed teams, and every knockout tie to the final — then see what the crowd predicts.