submitted by /u/No_Flamingo_6055 [link] [Kommentare] Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/robotics/comments/1ty4s8j/similar_issue_different_model_seeed_studio_servo/
Hi all, I’m trying to understand how people working with physical AI, embodied AI, robotics, or VLA models think about benchmarks in practice. This is not a product promotion or a request for upvotes. I’m looking for practical perspectives from people who run, read, or rely on benchmark results. A few questions: - Which benchmarks do you actually pay attention to? - Do benchmark scores influence model, policy, or framework choices, or are they mostly sanity checks? - What makes a benchmark result credible to you? - How much do you trust simulated task results compared with real-robot or hardware-in-the-loop results? - What are the biggest red flags when you see a physical AI benchmark claim? I’m especially interested in how people separate useful evidence from leaderboard noise, overfitting, cherry-picked demos, or unclear evaluation protocols. If this is too broad for this subreddit, I’m happy to narrow the question. submitted by /u/Confident_Gas_5266 [link] [Kommentare] Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/robotics/comments/1ty2zea/how_do_you_use_or_trust_physical_ai_robotics/
OmnipodKit brings open-source Omnipod 5 support to Loop and Trio. Open beta this summer. Source: https://ddataexchange.com/