Do you think BTC will hit $200K this year, or at least $150K? Price targets aside, what do you think would actually drive the next leg higher? ETFs, macro conditions, rate cuts, corporate adoption, or the continued expansion of Bitcoin's utility and infrastructure? Curious to hear what everyone thinks. submitted by /u/Ge_Yo [link] [Kommentare]
I'm hoping some of the Bitcoin experts here can help me understand what happened. I recently made a BTC withdrawal from GoMining to my Kraken deposit address. GoMining withdrawal screen showed: Withdrawal Amount: 0.00343202 BTC Fee: 0 BTC You'll Receive: 0.00343202 BTC Kraken later credited: 0.00342000 BTC Difference: 0.00001202 BTC (1,202 sats) Kraken manually reviewed the deposit and confirmed that transaction: a86609911ead87031cf75a808a965802f3adaa9f07e4fd0b88d66ea72a159112 was the transaction that delivered funds to my Kraken deposit address and that the amount received was exactly: 0.00342000 BTC Looking at the transaction on mempool.space: Transaction: a86609911ead87031cf75a808a965802f3adaa9f07e4fd0b88d66ea72a159112 Input: bc1qr2hhvpf3m0z4sx90nxqydccxlxkf4pe5mjfhcr 0.00343202 BTC Outputs: 0.00342000 BTC to: 3KtixuucHp3ZFSex3847Liv6v8m1xnvt8y 0.00001060 BTC to: bc1qgcq078znysgm6fsveu894e32mrzqy9n9ncjg0w Miner Fee: 0.00000142 BTC (142 sats) The math balances perfectly: 0.00342000 BTC + 0.00001060 BTC + 0.00000142 BTC = 0.00343202 BTC GoMining states that their withdrawal transaction is: 95333b087645e5fa1c2b64ea5e62f41ac3929a673aa7186697cf3a73916cd51d and that transaction a86609911ead87031cf75a808a965802f3adaa9f07e4fd0b88d66ea72a159112 was not created by them. Kraken states that they do not know who controls: bc1qr2hhvpf3m0z4sx90nxqydccxlxkf4pe5mjfhcr and that GoMining would need to explain how transaction: 95333b087645e5fa1c2b64ea5e62f41ac3929a673aa7186697cf3a73916cd51d ultimately resulted in transaction: a86609911ead87031cf75a808a965802f3adaa9f07e4fd0b88d66ea72a159112 being created. My goal is not to accuse either company of anything. I'm simply trying to understand: Who likely controlled the input address: bc1qr2hhvpf3m0z4sx90nxqydccxlxkf4pe5mjfhcr What the 1,060 sat output to: bc1qgcq078znysgm6fsveu894e32mrzqy9n9ncjg0w most likely represents. Whether this looks like a normal custody, batching, forwarding, exchange, or UTXO management process. Whether anyone can determine the relationship between: 95333b087645e5fa1c2b64ea5e62f41ac3929a673aa7186697cf3a73916cd51d and a86609911ead87031cf75a808a965802f3adaa9f07e4fd0b88d66ea72a159112 from publicly available blockchain data. Any help would be appreciated. submitted by /u/bbrian017 [link] [Kommentare]
Recently there was a large theft of Humanity tokens that on one side caused price crash, but on the other a huge discrepancy between prices on different blockchains. The current average price of Humanity is 0.18$ but on the BNB chain it's 0.000005$. I wonder how this issue can be tackled? Is there a possibility that the price on the BNB chain will equalise with the rest? Of course this isn't just curiosity, I invested a whooping 2$ into Humanity on BNB and I really hope, it'll turn into 90k or so /j. submitted by /u/Hopeful_Meeting_7248 [link] [Kommentare]
Could be a good beta play on hyperliquid and perps meta, but it looks to be doing its own thing lately submitted by /u/PeeOnDusk [link] [Kommentare]
And Charles Hoskinson is a snake oil salesman submitted by /u/LivingShine83 [link] [Kommentare]
Strong bounce off 59k on Fri, rising quickly up to 63k. Alts gaining across the board, looks like we are not over yet! submitted by /u/BrexitBrit [link] [Kommentare]
