Imagine Bitcoin’s price doesn’t move 1 cent up or down for the next few decades. As of now the have just over 28 years of coverage from their BTC pile. Lets take off 2 years assuming the 4 Bln of net debt has to be paid back, and another 2 for buying back stock trying to get the preferds back to par. That means in 24 years they are gone, and bitcoin carries on doing what it has been doing for nearly 2 decades. If the price rises they can keep the show on the road, and if it rises quickly enough they can do this indefinitely. If the price falls this all unravels more quickly. As long as there are users needing peer to peer money and miners willing to validate and broadcast transactions, Bitcoin goes on forever. submitted by /u/Leithm [link] [Kommentare]

I don't really care if the price goes down after I buy. I believe one day it will be at least 3x than it is now. And if I lose this money... it's still better than wasting it on stupid things! submitted by /u/MobApps1 [link] [Kommentare]

Short answer, yes, at least locally. Monthly chart is in Buy zone. Deepest price is 47k, but everyone is waiting instead of buying, I AM buying. https://www.youtube.com/live/JiDQQdHEbrA?si=nGF1n1oD98etuiWa submitted by /u/TheBarrendero [link] [Kommentare]

EACL 2027 just published their CFP which contains an important change to the common ARR process: For this cycle, author response and author-reviewer discussion are two separate stages Looking at the deadlines, they not only split the process but also allow more time: Author response period Sept 14-19, 2026 Reviewer engagement and Author-reviewer discussion Sept 20-24, 2026 Previously, ARR cycles only gave five days in total for the discussion period. ARR May 2026, for example, only gives July 7 to July 13 for the total authors-reviewer discussion (no separate author response period). In summary, that means not only that the process is being split in two stages but you now also have more time. --- In my opinion this is really good as in the past having just 5 days to post a reply (potentially involving new experiments - even though that is not the original idea of the discussion period) and getting into a discussion with the reviewers felt very tight - for authors and reviewers. I am, therefore, really looking forward to this change. Any thoughts? submitted by /u/S4M22 [link] [Kommentare]