R
Link preview
Can someone help trace where 1,202 sats went between a GoMining BTC withdrawal and a Kraken BTC deposit?
I'm hoping some of the Bitcoin experts here can help me understand what happened. I recently made a BTC withdrawal from GoMining to my Kraken deposit address. GoMining withdrawal screen showed: Withdrawal Amount: 0.00343202 BTC Fee: 0 BTC You'll Receive: 0.00343202 BTC Kraken later credited: 0.00342000 BTC Difference: 0.00001202 BTC (1,202 sats) Kraken manually reviewed the deposit and confirmed that transaction: a86609911ead87031cf75a808a965802f3adaa9f07e4fd0b88d66ea72a159112 was the transaction that delivered funds to my Kraken deposit address and that the amount received was exactly: 0.00342000 BTC Looking at the transaction on mempool.space: Transaction: a86609911ead87031cf75a808a965802f3adaa9f07e4fd0b88d66ea72a159112 Input: bc1qr2hhvpf3m0z4sx90nxqydccxlxkf4pe5mjfhcr 0.00343202 BTC Outputs: 0.00342000 BTC to: 3KtixuucHp3ZFSex3847Liv6v8m1xnvt8y 0.00001060 BTC to: bc1qgcq078znysgm6fsveu894e32mrzqy9n9ncjg0w Miner Fee: 0.00000142 BTC (142 sats) The math balances perfectly: 0.00342000 BTC + 0.00001060 BTC + 0.00000142 BTC = 0.00343202 BTC GoMining states that their withdrawal transaction is: 95333b087645e5fa1c2b64ea5e62f41ac3929a673aa7186697cf3a73916cd51d and that transaction a86609911ead87031cf75a808a965802f3adaa9f07e4fd0b88d66ea72a159112 was not created by them. Kraken states that they do not know who controls: bc1qr2hhvpf3m0z4sx90nxqydccxlxkf4pe5mjfhcr and that GoMining would need to explain how transaction: 95333b087645e5fa1c2b64ea5e62f41ac3929a673aa7186697cf3a73916cd51d ultimately resulted in transaction: a86609911ead87031cf75a808a965802f3adaa9f07e4fd0b88d66ea72a159112 being created. My goal is not to accuse either company of anything. I'm simply trying to understand: Who likely controlled the input address: bc1qr2hhvpf3m0z4sx90nxqydccxlxkf4pe5mjfhcr What the 1,060 sat output to: bc1qgcq078znysgm6fsveu894e32mrzqy9n9ncjg0w most likely represents. Whether this looks like a normal custody, batching, forwarding, exchange, or UTXO management process. Whether anyone can determine the relationship between: 95333b087645e5fa1c2b64ea5e62f41ac3929a673aa7186697cf3a73916cd51d and a86609911ead87031cf75a808a965802f3adaa9f07e4fd0b88d66ea72a159112 from publicly available blockchain data. Any help would be appreciated. submitted by /u/bbrian017 [link] [Kommentare] reddit.com · reddit.com ↗
I'm hoping some of the Bitcoin experts here can help me understand what happened. I recently made a BTC withdrawal from GoMining to my Kraken deposit address. GoMining withdrawal screen showed: Withdrawal Amount: 0.00343202 BTC Fee: 0 BTC You'll Receive: 0.00343202 BTC Kraken later credited: 0.00342000 BTC Difference: 0.00001202 BTC (1,202 sats) Kraken manually reviewed the deposit and confirmed that transaction: a86609911ead87031cf75a808a965802f3adaa9f07e4fd0b88d66ea72a159112 was the transaction that delivered funds to my Kraken deposit address and that the amount received was exactly: 0.00342000 BTC Looking at the transaction on mempool.space: Transaction: a86609911ead87031cf75a808a965802f3adaa9f07e4fd0b88d66ea72a159112 Input: bc1qr2hhvpf3m0z4sx90nxqydccxlxkf4pe5mjfhcr 0.00343202 BTC Outputs: 0.00342000 BTC to: 3KtixuucHp3ZFSex3847Liv6v8m1xnvt8y 0.00001060 BTC to: bc1qgcq078znysgm6fsveu894e32mrzqy9n9ncjg0w Miner Fee: 0.00000142 BTC (142 sats) The math balances perfectly: 0.00342000 BTC + 0.00001060 BTC + 0.00000142 BTC = 0.00343202 BTC GoMining states that their withdrawal transaction is: 95333b087645e5fa1c2b64ea5e62f41ac3929a673aa7186697cf3a73916cd51d and that transaction a86609911ead87031cf75a808a965802f3adaa9f07e4fd0b88d66ea72a159112 was not created by them. Kraken states that they do not know who controls: bc1qr2hhvpf3m0z4sx90nxqydccxlxkf4pe5mjfhcr and that GoMining would need to explain how transaction: 95333b087645e5fa1c2b64ea5e62f41ac3929a673aa7186697cf3a73916cd51d ultimately resulted in transaction: a86609911ead87031cf75a808a965802f3adaa9f07e4fd0b88d66ea72a159112 being created. My goal is not to accuse either company of anything. I'm simply trying to understand: Who likely controlled the input address: bc1qr2hhvpf3m0z4sx90nxqydccxlxkf4pe5mjfhcr What the 1,060 sat output to: bc1qgcq078znysgm6fsveu894e32mrzqy9n9ncjg0w most likely represents. Whether this looks like a normal custody, batching, forwarding, exchange, or UTXO management process. Whether anyone can determine the relationship between: 95333b087645e5fa1c2b64ea5e62f41ac3929a673aa7186697cf3a73916cd51d and a86609911ead87031cf75a808a965802f3adaa9f07e4fd0b88d66ea72a159112 from publicly available blockchain data. Any help would be appreciated. submitted by /u/bbrian017 [link] [Kommentare]
Comments