Dear Folks, I have created multiple content on Machine Learning(work in progress), and they are free. I am a data scientist and a post grad degree holder in AI/ML from IIT. To help the machine learning community with important Machine Learning Concepts, I have created multiple long form videos, and structured topicwise digestible contents structured as playlists for learning. If you go through the first two playlists: Introductory Machine Learning Concepts Probability Foundations: Univariate Models You might find helpful content, I have tried explaining with intuitions, derivations, and this is work in progress. For code implementations, scikit learn website has great content on them as well. In total they have 60+ topicwise videos so far, and I think they have the potential to help folks a lot in starting with concepts, or getting with mathematical concepts, or whether you are preparing for an AI/ML/Data job interviews etc. When I sat for my interviews, I was grilled on my project, but majority of questions from my project tested more on foundational concepts and there know how’s. These are FREE content on youtube. This is for the benefit of the learning community. Link: https://youtube.com/@aayushsugandh4036?si=w5MKORU2fWzLRrAJ submitted by /u/Negative_War_65 [link] [Kommentare]

Dear Folks, I have created multiple content on Machine Learning(work in progress), and they are free. I am a data scientist and a post grad degree holder in AI/ML. To help the machine learning community with important Machine Learning Concepts, I have created multiple long form videos, and structured topicwise digestible contents structured as playlists for learning. If you go through the first two playlists: Introductory Machine Learning Concepts Probability Foundations: Univariate Models You might find helpful content, I have tried explaining with intuitions, derivations, and this is work in progress. For code implementations, scikit learn website has great content on them as well. In total they have 60+ topicwise videos so far, and I think they have the potential to help folks a lot in starting with concepts, or getting with mathematical concepts, or whether you are preparing for an AI/ML/Data job interviews etc. When I sat for my interviews, I was grilled on my project, but majority of questions from my project tested more on foundational concepts and there know how’s. These are FREE content on youtube, and hope it benefits and helps the ML community. submitted by /u/Negative_War_65 [link] [Kommentare]

I use Claude Code, Codex CLI, OpenCode, Cline, Cursor, and Amp enough to notice a pattern in how they handle long context. They are all converging on layered progressive compression, but they disagree on what to protect. Most protect recent user messages as a first-class asset. That makes sense. The user said it, which is the source of truth. Most also protect tool outputs that carry state. What surprised me was how differently they treat old assistant messages. Artifacts keeps recent tool calls verbatim but drops older context aggressively. Cursor starts pruning earlier design decisions once the window gets full. Codex CLI lets the model itself decide what to keep in the summary tier. The other axis is transparency. Do you tell the model it was compressed? Some systems silently replace old tool results with a placeholder, which means the model is reasoning under the illusion that it never happened. Others make it explicit: "the previous 40 tool calls are summarized below." I lean explicit because the model needs to know its own context was degraded. Verdents agent loop uses a similar tiered approach: snip first, prune second, summarize last, and a hard red line that protects user messages, stateful tool outputs, and anything the user explicitly flagged. The tradeoff is cost vs accuracy. Aggressive compression saves tokens but degrades the plan. Under-compression hits the window and causes context rot. submitted by /u/Direct_Band896 [link] [Kommentare]

I am 16 years old and have absolutely no experience with Linux, and I am looking for a ROS 2 course. While the courses offered by The Construct seem quite comprehensive, I am concerned about some issues others have reported, such as incorrect quizzes, shallow content, or general quality problems. If you have experience with their courses, could you share how it went, or would you recommend other structured courses instead? submitted by /u/Initial_Animator1465 [link] [Kommentare]

I will start by saying cryptocurrency and Bitcoin in particular has inadvertently made fiat currency more valuable. In the early days of Bitcoin (roughly 2013 to 2017), many of us envisioned it as the future of money, an asset destined to sunset fiat and displace gold as the premier store of value. Fast forward to 2026, and the exact opposite has happened. ​ Instead of replacing fiat, Bitcoin has cemented it as an indispensable financial instrument. This might explain why we are seeing multiple crypto/bitcoin law proposals in many countries. Governments may have realised the bitcoin they feared will take the financial dominance from them, is **actually making them more powerful.** ​ During market downturns, those holding fiat emerge as the biggest winners. Even when inflation fears peak, public instinct drives people toward the stability of fiat, not the volatility of Bitcoin. This doesn't mean Bitcoin is a failure, but it validates Jim Cramer’s recent observation that Bitcoin makes for "bad money." (As much as I love to inverse Cramer, reality dictates that he is right on this one). ​ With a wave of incoming IPOs, Bitcoin remains the asset bearing the brunt of market volatility. While its resilience suggests BTC functions well as a store of value, if you can look past the painful **correction from $124k down to the $60k range**, the realization that it will never replace fiat as a daily medium of exchange is a bitter pill to swallow. This isn't an adoption issue; it is a structural one. Over the years, real-world utility has proven that Bitcoin is simply ill-suited to serve as money. ​ When someone asks me these days what makes bitcoin special I no longer say **"bitcoin will reshape how we see and use money"** I just reply "it has a hard cap, more cannot be minted". But inside me I know that is not enough to convince a skeptic and that feeling has left me on a number of occasions, disappointed at what bitcoin has become. submitted by /u/zesushv [link] [Kommentare]

What if Playmobil figures were scaled up and equipped with AI, turning them into physical AI companions? It could be fun if their hands kept the classic C shape design but were upgraded with 3or 4 degrees of articulation, allowing them to perform simple tasks. (such as fetching a pen, making tea or coffee, and other basic household activities) The face could be a display screen. When powered off, it would show the classic Playmobil eyes and smile. Once activated, it would come to life with expressive eyes and facial animations similar to the characters in , allowing it to move and interact more naturally. What do you think? submitted by /u/Difficult-Limit-7551 [link] [Kommentare]

Been spending a stupid amount of time on repetitive on-chain stuff lately like monitoring lending positions, chasing yields, revoking approvals, watching wallets, rebalancing across ETH/SOL/Polygon. None of it is hard. It's just tedious and time-consuming. There are point solutions for some of this but I haven't found anything that lets you just... wire things together yourself. Like: Wallet receives USDC -> Telegram ping Contract emits an event -> trigger a follow-up transaction APY on protocol A drops below B -> move funds Gas below X -> execute pending tx Curious if other people do this manually too or if I'm missing something obvious. What do you actually repeat the most? Is there a demand for such a platform? submitted by /u/c0m94d3 [link] [Kommentare]

Hi everyone, I need responses for a survey for my bachelor's thesis: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf2lJcNaLamChhLa1ib4lI89Ms7k5FYGzYtxS7rB6-d_LhIMQ/viewform?usp=publish-editor The survey is completely anonymous and takes only 5–7 minutes to complete. I would greatly appreciate your help. Thank you in advance! ❤️ Have a great day! 😊 submitted by /u/Embarrassed_Cod7118 [link] [Kommentare]

Do you think BTC will hit $200K this year, or at least $150K? Price targets aside, what do you think would actually drive the next leg higher? ETFs, macro conditions, rate cuts, corporate adoption, or the continued expansion of Bitcoin's utility and infrastructure? Curious to hear what everyone thinks. submitted by /u/Ge_Yo [link] [Kommentare]