https://www.fxstreet.com/cryptocurrencies/news/monero-prices-rocket-to-438-amid-120-million-onchain-laundering-maze-202606121217 submitted by /u/CriticalCobraz [link] [Kommentare]
Posting this to document my case and ask if anyone has had something similar resolved. Late last year I deposited a large amount of WETH on the Unichain network to a Kraken-provided deposit address (worth a substantial five-figure sum at the time). After it never credited, support told me that only native ETH — not WETH — was supported for deposits at that time. They opened a ticket to arrange a manual recovery. I knew Kraken doesn't guarantee recovery of unsupported tokens, but WETH is trivially convertible to ETH (it's just wrapped ETH; wrap/unwrap is a native function on the chain — you literally just call it), and given the amount I expected it to be slow but eventually resolved. Timeline: Late 2025 — Deposit made. Doesn't credit. Support confirms WETH unsupported and opens a ticket for manual recovery. January 2026 — Email from support: they "confirm that unsupported asset deposit mistake issue is now escalated with our technical team who will be executing a manual recovery attempt." Following months — Repeated copy-pasted "under active investigation" replies. I file a formal complaint to speed things up. Early June 2026 — Standard support still tells me my case is "under active investigation." The next morning (about ten hours later) — Compliance responds to my complaint: "due to technical limitations associated with this specific network and asset combination, recovery is not currently possible," adding that "at no stage has a recovery been confirmed or completed." My problem with this: The January email used plain indicative language ("will be executing a manual recovery attempt") with zero mention of any technical limitation that could make it impossible. Months later, it's suddenly "not possible" with no detail. The two June emails came roughly ten hours apart and contradict each other — one says active investigation, the next says it's impossible. It's hard to believe a recovery promised in January was only discovered to be technically impossible in that short window. It reads like the "technical impossibility" line is there to limit liability rather than reflect an actual engineering finding. Has anyone here recovered an unsupported-token deposit (especially WETH or a wrapped asset) after a similar back-and-forth? Did escalation, a regulator complaint, or a legal letter move things? Any pointers appreciated. (I have the ticket number and redacted email screenshots with timestamps — happy to share if a Kraken rep reaches out.) submitted by /u/That_Ring_5604 [link] [Kommentare]
I used to be into crypto from 2016-2021. Between 2019-2021, i made a x33 and just exited with my gains to focus on my personal life. I used to visit coinmarket everyday religiously back in those days. But now I don't know shit. A lot has changed. I don't really know where to start. Do you guys have any interesting coin to shill me up ? Or any newsletter of some good researcher that do macro analysis ? (i don't mind paying) Ty submitted by /u/NoiseDr [link] [Kommentare]
Before SpaceX IPO, Tesla and SpaceX revealed they both held considerable amount of btc, additionally Elon Musk back in the day openly embraced Dogecoin, many believes he holds a significant amount of the memecoin though undisclosed. With more than enough paper money to borrow against, I see Elon Musk/Tesla/SpaceX buying more btc and/or Dogecoin in the common weeks/months. submitted by /u/zesushv [link] [Kommentare]
Hey everyone, I got tired of paying massive monthly fees for premium alert tiers just to track multiple timeframes. To solve this, I built an Android utility called BitLogic. It is a pure market screener designed to let you visually stack your own custom technical analysis strategies and let the app scan the market for you 24/7. It currently supports live monitoring across Binance (Spot/Futures), Bybit (Spot/Futures), and CoinDCX. 🚀 Core Features Zero-Code Strategy Builder: Combine conditions using advanced AND/OR logic blocks without writing a single line of code. True Background Automation: Your strategies run continuously in the background, even when the app is closed, pushing instant notifications when your exact setups hit. Simultaneous Multi-Timeframe Checks: Scan across various intervals at the exact same time (1m, 5m, 15m, 1h, 4h, 1d) to catch micro momentum matching macro trends. Frictionless Guest Mode: Test the core strategy builder and manual scanning tools instantly without creating an account or providing an email. 📊 Supported Indicators & Data Points We are currently using a total of 124 data points, which breaks down into exactly 60 indicators/price actions and 64 candlestick patterns. Here is the exact breakdown by category: Technical Indicators (60 total): Trend & Overlap (19): SMA, EMA, MACD, Bollinger Bands, Ichimoku, Supertrend, etc. Momentum & Oscillators (23): RSI, Stochastic, MFI, ADX, CCI, MACD, etc. Volatility (6): ATR, Keltner Channels, Donchian Channels, etc. Volume (7): OBV, Chaikin Money Flow, VWMA, etc. Price Action (5): Open, High, Low, Close, Volume (The remaining 64 data points are fully dedicated to candlestick patterns). The Android version is completely free and live right now. (A native Windows desktop version is hitting the Microsoft Store soon). Check it out here: BitLogic.info I'd love to hear your thoughts on the scanning speed or the UI. Let me know what indicators you want me to add to the builder next! submitted by /u/SituationBoth7745 [link] [Kommentare]
spcx is turning into a clean case study for tokenized stocks. the basic setup is simple: spacex is expected to trade on nasdaq under spcx, and tokenized versions of the shares are also being discussed for solana through platforms like backpack securities and sunrise defi. a few things i’m tracking: spcx - the main equity ticker. big name, huge attention, and probably a useful benchmark for how much demand exists outside normal brokerage rails. sol - the chain getting the attention here. if tokenized public equities actually get real usage, settlement speed, liquidity, custody and compliance all matter more than the usual crypto narrative. backpack securities - worth watching because the claim is that the token is backed 1:1 by actual shares with redemption mechanics. that part matters more than just “stock on-chain.” sunrise defi - another piece of the infrastructure side. not as easy to evaluate from the headline, but tokenized equities need more than just a ticker and a smart contract. traditional brokers - still relevant here. if the normal share and the tokenized version both exist, the spread, fees, access rules and redemption process become the whole story. tldr: tokenized equities are moving from theory into more visible tests. spcx is just a much louder example because the underlying company has mainstream attention already. what would you care about most before trusting a tokenized stock: custody, redemption, liquidity, regulation, or fees? submitted by /u/GurneyStewart [link] [Kommentare]
I spent the last few days building a small side project called Coindrips. https://coindrips.github.io/ The idea came from a simple frustration: there are hundreds of crypto reward sites, games, and blockchain-based platforms scattered across the internet, but finding legitimate ones usually means digging through old forum posts, YouTube videos, and random blog lists. So I built a clean directory that organizes them in one place with short explanations, signup guidance, and beginner-friendly instructions. I tried to keep the site minimal, fast, and easy to navigate, especially for people who are new to crypto and don't know where to start. Just a personal project I wanted to build and share with the community. I'd genuinely appreciate feedback on: • Design and usability • Sites I should add or remove • Features that would make discovery easier • Anything that feels confusing or unnecessary Would love to hear what you think. And if you have any other sites to add, feel free to mention them. submitted by /u/Arch7er [link] [Kommentare]